Adolescent Effusive

I Like Bush. Please Ridicule and Judge Me.

Please don't disrespect me by not reading all of this. You cannot just skim it and say you know what I think. It took me the whole essay to get my opinion out. If you want to know what it is, please inform yourselves. I have done what I can to show you my true colors. You have to do your part by actually reading this rather than thinking you already know what I have to say. Missing one sentance may change your entire view.

George W. Bush may not be the most eloquent public speaker, but he knows that killing those who have not even a voice to protest with is unacceptable in America. Our citizens cry out, “Murderer!” at the sight of George Bush, because we have lost 1,000 troops over the past year due to his decision to go to war in Iraq. Strange how one man who sacrifices 1,000 volunteers’ lives in an honest attempt to free Iraq of oppressive rule is battered verbally and a man who is a strong advocate for the theft of 4,000 innocent American lives daily (1,460,000 yearly) is exalted. Who is the greater transgressor? The man whose plan for liberty and justice fails to go exactly as he intended, or the man who consciously decides that killing people who have not even had the chance to see the face of their own mothers is a constitutional and ethical thing to do? I thought that the answer was obvious, but clearly, the American public lost its eyesight when it lost two tall towers.
If it has not been made plain that my number one issue for this election is abortion, I will tell you now: My number one issue is abortion. It is incredible to me that Americans will completely ignore the simple fact that, as soon as a zygote is created, there is a human life existing. Every human has his or her own set of genes, containing 46 chromosomes. A zygote has a totally unique set of 46 chromosomes. Simply because the zygote does not look like a human at first does not mean that it is not human, nor does it mean that it will never be recognizable to us. People who are still in the womb are, believe it or not, people. All they need is nutrition and nurturing in order to become mature humans.
My classmates and I are not all that dissimilar to those not yet born. We are adolescents, or unfinished adults. To punish us for the simple fact that we have not been alive long enough to become mature humans is outrageous and I am sure that the whole country would be in uproar if any law prevented us from reaching our full potential. How a being that has only been in existence for a few weeks is different is something that I am incapable of fathoming.
John Kerry, no doubt, knows the medical facts about abortion. He knows how and when one is performed. He knows the developmental stages of a child. At least, one would assume that he would. I cannot see how someone who expects to run our country efficiently would not have taken a biology class in his entire life. John Kerry also knows what a partial-birth abortion is: the procedure of forcing the child who is as developed as 9 months out of the womb until only its head remains inside and then puncturing the skull and suctioning the brain out. This is the most repulsive and despicable act known to man: murder. That is not to say that an abortion done at one month is not murder but, at this time, the child’s nervous system has not yet allowed him or her to feel pain. Clearly, partial-birth is the cruelest. I’m sure that, before the skull is punctured, the doctors would even see feet kicking and arms thrashing, just as a toddler be observed doing in a painful situation.
John Kerry knows exactly what these procedures entail. He was given the chance six times to ban only partial-birth abortions and, each time, he voted in favor of keeping this procedure legal. His vice president, John Edwards, did the same. By electing Kerry and Edwards, we are increasing our chances of living in a nation where partial-birth abortions are legal and accepted. Advocating partial-birth abortions is simply ludicrous. Why not simply allow the child to live another three months in the womb and take advantage of the safe haven laws? Safe haven laws allow children to be dropped off at hospitals without any questioning. This totally counters the “dumpster baby” argument against prohibition of abortion. There is no reason to have an abortion, expressly a partial-birth abortion.
Kerry is even cited saying that he will do everything in his power to create a totally pro-choice supreme court. Where is the democracy in having only one side of an issue represented? Is John Kerry sure he is running for president of the global beacon of equality and democratic ideals? Perhaps he thinks he is running for dictator of a third-world nation that has never tasted the sweetness of government by the people. I would like to ask him.
John Kerry is trying to seem like he is a strong supporter of women and provides them the right to choose. Women, unless raped, already have the right to choose. Kerry has not provided that right, but he is making it seem like he has. Does he think he is the creator of free will? I was unaware that God is running for president of the United States.
Women simply refuse to accept the consequences of their actions. Some women will say that their rights are not equal to men’s because men do not have to give birth to children they do not want. I am terribly sorry, but I was under the impression that, unless terribly misled, all women go into sexual intercourse with the knowledge that they are female. Females have uteruses. Females give birth. Men are physically incapable of this. It is a medical fact of life. Women who think their rights should be the same as men are indirectly saying they should be men. Equal rights should be applicable to all things that do not directly relate to the anatomy of women. Honestly, if someone is female and capable of bearing children, they were born that way, just as their brother was born with the gene for baldness. Being female is something that is irreversible and should be embraced, not denied. John Kerry, by supporting women denying their bodies’ natural, biological processes, is trying to make women more like men: the feminist’s worst nightmare.
Also, Mr. Kerry is physically harming women by allowing them to have abortions. Having an abortion directly increases the likelihood of becoming sterile. Many women who have abortions need to have hysterectomies later on in life, which leads to many hormonal problems. Having an abortion will actually increase the risk of breast cancer for women whose genetic makeup makes them more susceptible to this strain of cancer. Also, there are the obvious psychological side effects that will affect some women for life. Kerry believes he is mending women’s lives by allowing them to have abortions, but all he is doing is putting off suffering.
Another qualm I have with John Kerry is that he is Catholic but still supports abortion. He says does not approve of abortion, but he cannot impose his religion on other Americans. I wish Mr. Kerry would please tell me which religion it is he feels he would be offending by outlawing murder. He has made me so curious. I would relish the opportunity to meet a member of this mysterious creed he speaks of and read his or her religious texts and discover the reasoning for the establishment of this belief-system.
Yes, Mr. Bush is a born-again Christian. No, not everyone is a born-again Christian. However, we are all human. We all can agree that murder is not exactly philanthropic. Let us put that matter aside and consider this: who is better suited for leading a nation, the man who says he is for one religion and does the precise opposite of what that religion stands for, or the man who states what his convictions are and acts accordingly? I would feel unsafe with John Kerry as president. I fear that he would tell me one thing to my face, but once he is in his office, behind closed doors, he would do the opposite. If he can deny his Catholic beliefs, why would he steadfastly support another idea? I cannot take anything he says as the truth with any kind of reassurance. I do actually agree with certain things he says, but I simply cannot trust him with the fate of a nation that contains so many people I love and so many people who deserve the chance to flourish in a nation that does what is best for mankind, not what is best for a man.

posted by M.Jazz @ 5:40 PM